Gassendi, Pierre
,
De proportione qua gravia decidentia accelerantur
,
1646
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
321 - 330
331 - 340
341 - 350
351 - 360
>
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
321 - 330
331 - 340
341 - 350
351 - 360
>
page
|<
<
of 360
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001963
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
262
"
xlink:href
="
028/01/302.jpg
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
ſit ad figmenta hæc tua confugere.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001964
"> Sed, Vir religioſiſſime,
<
lb
/>
inter nos non ambigitur, ſit-ne naturalis inclinatio
<
lb
/>
hiſce rebus ab Opifice ſapientiſſimo indita; quippe
<
lb
/>
qualiſcumque ea ſit, tam ego illam eſſe à Deo agnoſ
<
lb
/>
co, & fateor, quam tu: ſed hoc ſolùm ambigitur, qua
<
lb
/>
lis nimirùm illa ſit? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001965
">An non repugnantia? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001966
">An quid
<
lb
/>
poſitiuum? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001967
">An mera diſpoſitio? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001968
">An quidpiam ſub
<
lb
/>
ſtantiæ adiunctum? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001969
">An externa affectio? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001970
">An interna
<
lb
/>
propenſio? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001971
">Et, ſi ſit propenſio, ſiue expreſſio, impul
<
lb
/>
ſio, actus eiuſdem quaſi ponderis; quæ ſit ponderis
<
lb
/>
huiuſce conditio? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001972
">Qua id ratione ſe exſerat, vt fiat
<
lb
/>
propendentia? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001973
">Et, ſi ſit ſolùm propendentia, quomo
<
lb
/>
do ab illa non ſit ſolus caſus? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001974
">Quomodo etiam actio?
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001975
">Quomodo non ſine delectu? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001976
">cæteraque id genus alia,
<
lb
/>
quæ noſſe foret operæ-pretium. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001977
">Quare non debes
<
lb
/>
mea figmenta ſic accipere, quaſiego ipſa in locum in
<
lb
/>
ditæ à Deo inclinationis obtendam. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001978
">Enimverò illa
<
lb
/>
vſurpo, quaſi quaſdam hypotheſeis, quibus coner,
<
lb
/>
quatenus poſſum, intelligere, atque explicare indu
<
lb
/>
ſtriam admirabilem, qua ſapientiſſimus Opifex voluit
<
lb
/>
ſua hæc opera proprias exſerere actiones. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001979
">Atque id
<
lb
/>
quidem eadem ratione, qua Aſtronomi, dum hypo
<
lb
/>
theſeis, ſeu mavis fig menta in cælum inducunt. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001980
">Ne
<
lb
/>
que enim ad eas confugiunt, quaſi motum cælo, aut ſi
<
lb
/>
deribus fuiſſe à Deo inditum negent; ſed, vt illo ſuppo
<
lb
/>
ſito, intelligant, ac explicent quomodo huiuſmodi
<
lb
/>
motus fieri poſſit tam multiplex, tam conſonans, tam
<
lb
/>
regularis. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001981
">Ac fortè tu quidem ſapienter, cùm innuis
<
lb
/>
debere ſufficere nobis, ſi circa rerum contemplatio
<
lb
/>
nem, cognoſcamus de illis, quòd ſint: neque fingendas </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>