Gassendi, Pierre, De proportione qua gravia decidentia accelerantur, 1646

List of thumbnails

< >
311
311
312
312
313
313
314
314
315
315
316
316
317
317
318
318
319
319
320
320
< >
page |< < of 360 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.002043">
                <pb pagenum="273" xlink:href="028/01/313.jpg"/>
              Ariſtoteles eſt ab ea alienus, qui niſi velit alterationem
                <lb/>
              eſſe motionem quandam localem; ſaltem agnoſeit al­
                <lb/>
              terationem abſque motione locali non eſſe. </s>
              <s id="s.002044">Quòd
                <lb/>
              verò proptereà
                <emph type="italics"/>
              qualitates, ſeu
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              (vt generaliùs videris lo­
                <lb/>
              quutus)
                <emph type="italics"/>
              formæ accidentales inueniri & eſſe ab omni ſubſtan­
                <lb/>
              tia ſeparatæ non valeant:
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              vnde nam, quæſo, colligis, vt
                <lb/>
              non colligas pari modo ex Ariſtotelea ſententia? </s>
              <s id="s.002045">Et, ſi
                <lb/>
              cùm Ariſtoteles manifeſtè faciat, qualitates, ſiue acci­
                <lb/>
              dentaleis formas, inſeparabileis à ſubſtantia, id admit­
                <lb/>
              titur, quatenus ſolis viribus naturæ ſpectatis eſt verum;
                <lb/>
              reiicitur autem, quatenus ſpectata Authoris naturæ
                <lb/>
              potentia eſt falſum: quid eſt, cur eædem qualitates, alio
                <lb/>
              licet modo, quàm Ariſtoteleo expoſitæ, dici non va­
                <lb/>
              leant exſiſtere poſſe ſeparatæ à ſubſtantia, non na­
                <lb/>
              turali quidem, ſed diuina tamen virtute? </s>
              <s id="s.002046">Neque
                <lb/>
              enim eſt, cur exiſtimes calorem, v.g quà eſt calor,
                <lb/>
              formaliterve, vt loquuntur, accipitur, eſſe ipſaſmet ato­
                <lb/>
              mos, atomorumve ſubſtantiam; vt neque idem calor
                <lb/>
              in ſententia vulgari, ignis eſt, eiuſve ſubſtantia. </s>
              <s id="s.002047">Quip­
                <lb/>
              pe, vt in communi ſententia calor eſt formaliter quæ­
                <lb/>
              dam qualitas ſubſtantiæ ignis attributa, quatenus eius
                <lb/>
              eſt naturæ, vt calefacere, ſeu certo modo afficere corpo­
                <lb/>
              ra ſibi admota poſſit: ita etiam erit qualitas atomorum
                <lb/>
              ſubſtantiæ conueniens, quatenus ſui motu, penetratio­
                <lb/>
              neque in aliquod corpus, ipſum diſgregant, exſoluunt­
                <lb/>
              que; & animatum ſifuerit, non ſine ſenſu aliquo ſpe­
                <lb/>
              ciali ipſius id faciunt. </s>
              <s id="s.002048">Quare & licet vi naturæ non
                <lb/>
              poſſit talis qualitas ſine talibus eſſe atomis, ipſarumve
                <lb/>
              ſubſtantia, eo modo, quo dices eſſe eandem abſque
                <lb/>
              igne, eiuſve ſubſtantia non poſſe, quatenus in neutra </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>