Gassendi, Pierre
,
De proportione qua gravia decidentia accelerantur
,
1646
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
321 - 330
331 - 340
341 - 350
351 - 360
>
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
321 - 330
331 - 340
341 - 350
351 - 360
>
page
|<
<
of 360
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.002043
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
273
"
xlink:href
="
028/01/313.jpg
"/>
Ariſtoteles eſt ab ea alienus, qui niſi velit alterationem
<
lb
/>
eſſe motionem quandam localem; ſaltem agnoſeit al
<
lb
/>
terationem abſque motione locali non eſſe. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002044
">Quòd
<
lb
/>
verò proptereà
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
qualitates, ſeu
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
(vt generaliùs videris lo
<
lb
/>
quutus)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
formæ accidentales inueniri & eſſe ab omni ſubſtan
<
lb
/>
tia ſeparatæ non valeant:
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
vnde nam, quæſo, colligis, vt
<
lb
/>
non colligas pari modo ex Ariſtotelea ſententia? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002045
">Et, ſi
<
lb
/>
cùm Ariſtoteles manifeſtè faciat, qualitates, ſiue acci
<
lb
/>
dentaleis formas, inſeparabileis à ſubſtantia, id admit
<
lb
/>
titur, quatenus ſolis viribus naturæ ſpectatis eſt verum;
<
lb
/>
reiicitur autem, quatenus ſpectata Authoris naturæ
<
lb
/>
potentia eſt falſum: quid eſt, cur eædem qualitates, alio
<
lb
/>
licet modo, quàm Ariſtoteleo expoſitæ, dici non va
<
lb
/>
leant exſiſtere poſſe ſeparatæ à ſubſtantia, non na
<
lb
/>
turali quidem, ſed diuina tamen virtute? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002046
">Neque
<
lb
/>
enim eſt, cur exiſtimes calorem, v.g quà eſt calor,
<
lb
/>
formaliterve, vt loquuntur, accipitur, eſſe ipſaſmet ato
<
lb
/>
mos, atomorumve ſubſtantiam; vt neque idem calor
<
lb
/>
in ſententia vulgari, ignis eſt, eiuſve ſubſtantia. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002047
">Quip
<
lb
/>
pe, vt in communi ſententia calor eſt formaliter quæ
<
lb
/>
dam qualitas ſubſtantiæ ignis attributa, quatenus eius
<
lb
/>
eſt naturæ, vt calefacere, ſeu certo modo afficere corpo
<
lb
/>
ra ſibi admota poſſit: ita etiam erit qualitas atomorum
<
lb
/>
ſubſtantiæ conueniens, quatenus ſui motu, penetratio
<
lb
/>
neque in aliquod corpus, ipſum diſgregant, exſoluunt
<
lb
/>
que; & animatum ſifuerit, non ſine ſenſu aliquo ſpe
<
lb
/>
ciali ipſius id faciunt. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002048
">Quare & licet vi naturæ non
<
lb
/>
poſſit talis qualitas ſine talibus eſſe atomis, ipſarumve
<
lb
/>
ſubſtantia, eo modo, quo dices eſſe eandem abſque
<
lb
/>
igne, eiuſve ſubſtantia non poſſe, quatenus in neutra </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>