Gassendi, Pierre
,
De proportione qua gravia decidentia accelerantur
,
1646
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
321 - 330
331 - 340
341 - 350
351 - 360
>
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
321 - 330
331 - 340
341 - 350
351 - 360
>
page
|<
<
of 360
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.002149
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
290
"
xlink:href
="
028/01/330.jpg
"/>
depellere? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002150
">Et verò ſi fortè vixiſſes ante illud tempus,
<
lb
/>
quo Mathematici demonſtrârunt, aut ſaltem dixerunt
<
lb
/>
eſſe Solem circiter centies ſeptuagies Terra maio
<
lb
/>
rem: quam igitur illud cenſuiſſes ab omni ratione
<
lb
/>
abhorrens? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002151
">Et cùm iam vides vulgò admitti id, quod
<
lb
/>
memoratum iam eſt, eſſe Stellas fixas, quæ ſint centies
<
lb
/>
octies maiores, quàm Terra, & quater millies, quàm
<
lb
/>
ipſa Luna: cur non id abhorrens à ratione putas? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002152
">An
<
lb
/>
meliùs capis, ob quam rationem Deus illas fecerit tan
<
lb
/>
tas? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002153
">An-non, ſi id, quod dicimus, tuo ſenſu abſurdum
<
lb
/>
eſt: ſecundum magis, & minus ſolùm erit diſcrimen
<
lb
/>
abſurditatis? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002154
">Habes-ne verò interim vllum omninò
<
lb
/>
argumentum, quo Stellas eſſe tantas ſic probes, vt ſi
<
lb
/>
mùl probes aut non eſſe, aut non poſſe eſſe maiores?
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002155
">Non certè; ſed penitùs gratis in ea conſiſtis magnitu
<
lb
/>
dine; neque eſt tibi maior ratio quærendi ex nobis,
<
lb
/>
cur procedamus vlteriùs: quàm nobis quærendi ex te,
<
lb
/>
quamobrem conſiſtas citeriùs. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002156
">Dicere ad ſummum
<
lb
/>
potes, tibi ſic videri; & quia ſic videtur, nos à ratione
<
lb
/>
abhorrere: quid-ni & nobis pari iure dicere dete idem
<
lb
/>
liceat? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002157
">Quanquam & nobis ratio eſt, tum admiranda
<
lb
/>
concinnitas, quæ hac ſuppoſita amplitudine obſerua
<
lb
/>
tur; tum commendatio operum Dei, quæ tu, quantum
<
lb
/>
potes, extenuas, dum ea non maiora tuo captu facis.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002158
">Quippe huiuſmodi amplitudo diuinæ potentiæ, ſa
<
lb
/>
pientiæ, & magniſicentiæ conſentanea eſt: neque eſt,
<
lb
/>
cur tu abſque vlla aut obſeruatione, aut ratione illam
<
lb
/>
contrahas, vel abſurdam putes. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002159
">Quæſo te, inquam, Vir
<
lb
/>
Religioſiſſime, ecquid-nam illis dicturus ſim, cùm
<
lb
/>
hæc, & ſimilia reponent? </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>