Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Table of contents

< >
[Item 1.]
[2.] Ex Libris James S. Dearden Rampside
[3.] A DISCOVERY OF A New , OR,
[4.] In Two Parts.
[5.] The Fifth Edition Corrected and Amended. LONDON,
[6.] The Epiſtle to the READER.
[7.] The Propoſitions that are proved in this Diſcourſe. PROPOSITION I.
[8.] PROP. II.
[9.] PROP. III.
[10.] PROP. IV.
[11.] PROP. V.
[12.] PROP. VI.
[13.] PROP. VII.
[14.] PROP. VIII.
[15.] PROP. IX.
[16.] PROP. X.
[17.] PROP. XI.
[18.] PROP. XII.
[19.] PROP. XIII.
[20.] PROP. XIV.
[21.] The Firſt Book. That the MOON May be a WORLD. The Firſt Propoſition, by way of Preface.
[22.] Sed vanus ſtolidis hæc omnia finxerit Error.
[23.] Solis lunæq; labores.
[24.] Cum fruſtra reſonant æra auxiliaria Lunæ.
[25.] Una laboranti poterit ſuccerrere Lunæ.
[26.] Gantus & è cælo poſſunt deducere Lunam.
[27.] Cantus & ſi curru lunam deducere tentant, Et facerent, ſi non æra repulſa ſonant.
[28.] PROP. II. That a Plurality of Worlds doth not contradict any Principle of Reaſon or Faith.
[29.] Æſtuas infelix auguſto limite mundi.
[30.] PROP. III. That the Heavens do not conſiſt of any ſuch pure Matter, which can priviledge them from the like Change and Corruption, as theſe Inferiour, Bodies are liable unto.
< >
page |< < (80) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div274" type="section" level="1" n="60">
          <pb o="80" file="0260" n="260" rhead="That the Earth may be a Planet."/>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3874" xml:space="preserve">3. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3875" xml:space="preserve">That places muſt be as far diſtant in
              <lb/>
            ſcituation, as in uſe :</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3876" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3877" xml:space="preserve">Which becauſe they are taken for gran-
              <lb/>
            ted, without any proof, and are in them-
              <lb/>
            ſelves but weak and doubtſul: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3878" xml:space="preserve">therefore the
              <lb/>
            concluſion (which always follows the worſer
              <lb/>
            part) cannot be ſtrong, and ſo will not need
              <lb/>
            any other anſwer.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3879" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3880" xml:space="preserve">The ſecond ſort of Arguments taken from
              <lb/>
            natural Philoſophy, are principally theſe
              <lb/>
            three:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3881" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3882" xml:space="preserve">Arg. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3883" xml:space="preserve">1. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3884" xml:space="preserve">From the vileneſs of our Earth,
              <lb/>
            becauſe it conſiſts of a more ſordid and baſe
              <lb/>
            Matter than any other part of the World;
              <lb/>
            </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3885" xml:space="preserve">and therefore, muſt be ſcituated in the Cen-
              <lb/>
            tre, which is the worſt place, and at the
              <lb/>
            greateſt diſtance from thoſe purer incorrup-
              <lb/>
            tible Bodies, the Heavens.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3886" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3887" xml:space="preserve">I anſwer : </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3888" xml:space="preserve">This Argument does ſuppoſe
              <lb/>
            ſuch Propoſitions for Grounds, which are
              <lb/>
            not yet proved; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3889" xml:space="preserve">and therefore not to be
              <lb/>
            granted. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3890" xml:space="preserve">As,</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3891" xml:space="preserve">1. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3892" xml:space="preserve">That Bodies muſt be as far diſtant in
              <lb/>
            Place, as in Nobility.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3893" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3894" xml:space="preserve">2. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3895" xml:space="preserve">That the Earth is a more ignoble Sub-
              <lb/>
            ſtance than any of the other Planets, con-
              <lb/>
            ſiſting of a more baſe and vile Matter.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3896" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3897" xml:space="preserve">3. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3898" xml:space="preserve">That the Centre is the worſt place.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3899" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3900" xml:space="preserve">All which, are, if not evidently falſe,
              <lb/>
            yet very uncertain.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3901" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3902" xml:space="preserve">Arg. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3903" xml:space="preserve">2. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3904" xml:space="preserve">From the nature of the Centre,
              <lb/>
            which is the place of Reſt, and ſuch as in
              <lb/>
            all circular Motions, is it ſelf immovable;
              <lb/>
            </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3905" xml:space="preserve">And therefore will be the fitteſt </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>